Duplicated event before invoice finalization
Confirm source event IDs before issuing credits.
01 Revenue assurance for Stripe
MeterGuard Solo reconciles product usage against Stripe billing exports, then turns every mismatch into evidence your team can review before a customer finds it.
Synthetic audit / June
Keep Stripe.
Bring your exports.
Leave with proof.
Audit method
Deterministic, not mysterious
Provide product-side usage and Stripe billing rows for the same period. The audit stays CSV-first and read-only.
Expected and billed quantities are compared by customer, metric, source identifier, and invoice period.
Receive impact estimates, affected customer labels, evidence references, and concrete next checks.
Evidence file
Sample findings
Each finding states what changed, who may be affected, the estimated invoice impact, and the next verification step.
Confirm source event IDs before issuing credits.
Compare product ledger totals to Stripe billed quantities.
Review late events against invoice period boundaries.
Engagement
Start with one billing period
Prove recurring value with a bounded manual engagement. Monitoring only follows when the audit earns it.
Starter audit
CSV reconciliation and a redacted anomaly report.
Deeper audit
Report, review call, and notes for the highest-risk findings.
Monitoring pilot
A recurring check for teams with repeatable audit demand.
Open an audit file
This form opens a prefilled email. It does not store details or accept CSV uploads.
Boundaries
What this is and is not
No. MeterGuard Solo checks the correctness of usage billing for teams already using Stripe.
No. CSV audits stay in the local CLI workflow; this site does not upload customer data.
No. Every preview on this page uses synthetic data and redacted-style customer labels.
Only after manual audits demonstrate enough repeatable demand to justify it.